HP-26-S02
Beech fork
A Forest Datum, Hooke Park, in service as a support No QR tag fixed yet
Photographs
Identity and source
- What it is
- Beech forkEObserved by eye
- Quantity
- 1MMeasured
- Where it is now
- A Forest Datum, Hooke Park, in service as a supportNot yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui ZhangMMeasured
- Woodchip Barn number
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- Locating holes and machined faces
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
| Node | What is known | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Standing beech at Hooke Park, surveyed photographically | 204 trees surveyed, felling yielded 25 usable forks | Done by others, to be checked |
| Woodchip Barn, 2016 | This piece reconnected to its 2016 identity: the in-situ model matched against the 2016 geometry and cross-checked against the published elevations of the twenty-five | Reconstructed from photographs or remains |
| Dismantling | Nothing was recorded | Done but not recorded |
| Selection for A Forest Datum | Why these five pieces were chosen is not recorded | Done but not recorded |
| A Forest Datum, in service as a support | Standing | Measured |
Condition
- Dimensions and geometry
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- Moisture content
- Measured in situNot yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui ZhangMMeasured
- Rot and defects
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- Visual assessment
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- Photographs
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
Processing
- Basis
- 204 standing beech surveyed; felling yielded 25 usable forks
- What changed
- Tree to fork
- Result
- One of the 25
- Basis
- Felled deliberately long, then slid between its fixing points until its curves best matched the target, and only then trimmed
- What changed
- Length trimmed
- Result
- On record with its method
- Basis
- Every one of the twenty-five was drilled with a first set of three holes before scanning; the twenty that went on to the robot bear a second set and milled faces
- What changed
- Holes and milled faces added
- Result
- Traces that now carry the attribution
- Result
- Standing
- Basis
- Modelled where it stands
- What changed
- Nothing removed
- Result
- Model used to reconnect the 2016 identity
- Basis
- In situ
- What changed
- Nothing removed
- Result
- Dated value
Annotation
7 entries carry a source; 9 cells are blank, each with its kind of gap and the person who would have to supply it.
- Sourced
granularity,location,moisture,origin_chain,quantity,wb_confidence,what- defects
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- dimensions
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- geometry file
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- location date
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- machining state
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- moisture date
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- photos
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- visual note
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
- wb fork id
- Not yet recordedTo be supplied by: Zhirui Zhang
Model
What this piece has been
Cut in 2016 with its method published, and cut again in 2024 with nothing recorded. A Forest Datum ran two regimes side by side: a deck of standardised cells on five supports, each worked as a single piece, and only the standardised half is on record. The project's only peer-reviewed account describes the deck and mentions neither the supports, their charring, nor any reclaimed timber. A Forest Datum is described as designed for disassembly and reuse; the supports fall outside that description, and if it is dismantled they will emerge as five worked pieces with no record of the work.
Woodchip Barn · one of the twenty-five forks felled for the truss · 2015-2016to be printed